Example academic essay

Example essay that is academic The Death Penalty. This essay shows many features that are important commonly appear in essays.

If the death penalty be restored in britain?

The restoration associated with the death penalty for serious crimes is an issue of debate in britain due to the rise that is recent violent crime. The causes, effects and solutions to the nagging problems of violent crime throw up a number of complex issues that are further complicated in addition that crime is reported. Newspapers often sensationalise crime so that you can increase circulation and also this makes objective discussion more difficult. This essay will firstly examine this topic by thinking about the arguments put forward by those who work in favour regarding the death penalty after which by looking at the arguments in opposition to the theory.

The primary arguments in preference of restoring the death penalty are those of deterrence and retribution: the theory is that people will be dissuaded from violent crime if they know they’re going to face the best punishment and therefore people should face exactly the same treatment that they gave off to others. Statistics show that when the death penalty was temporarily withdrawn in Britain between 1965 and 1969 the murder rate increased by 125% (Clark, 2005). However, we must look at the possibility that other reasons might have lead to this rise. Amnesty International (1996) claims that it is impractical to prove that capital punishment is a higher deterrent than being given a life sentence in prison and that “evidence….gives no support towards the evidence hypothesis theory.” It seems at best that the deterrence theory is yet to be proven. The thought of ‘retribution’ is an interesting one: there is a basic appeal in the straightforward phrase ‘the punishment should fit the crime’. Calder (2003) neatly summarises this argument as he says that killers give up their rights once they kill and therefore if punishments are too lenient then it reveals that we undervalue the ability to live. There are various other points too in support of the death penalty, one of these simple being cost. It is obviously far cheaper to execute prisoners promply rather than feed and house them for decades at a time.

The arguments up against the death penalty are mainly ethical within their nature, that it’s basically wrong to kill and that if the state kills it sends out the wrong message towards the rest of the country. Webber (2005) claims that the death penalty makes people genuinely believe that ‘killing people is morally permissable’. That is an argument that is interesting can you teach children to not hit by hitting them? Wouldn’t this instead suggest to them that hitting was indeed ‘permissable’? There’s also the fact you could execute people that are innocent. Innocent people can invariably be released from their website prison, however they can’t ever be brought back from the dead. When anyone have been killed there’s no possibility of rehabilitation or criminals trying to make up for crimes. Because of this reason capital punishment has been called ‘the bluntest of blunt instruments’ (Clark, 2005).

In summary, the arguments put forward by those who support or are from the death penalty often reflect their deeper principles and beliefs. These beliefs and principles are deeply rooted in life experiences together with real way people are brought up consequently they are unlikely to be swayed by clever arguments. It really is interesting that in this country many people are in preference of the death penalty yet parliament will continue to oppose it. In this case it may be argued that parliament is leading the way in upholding human rights and continues to broadcast the message that is clear killing is obviously wrong.

You ought to be in a position to see that this essay consist of:

An introduction in three parts:
1. A sentence saying why the subject is relevant and interesting.
2. A sentence (or two) mentioning the issues and issues active in the topic.
3. An overview regarding the essay.

Main paragraphs with:
1. A topic sentence which provides a main idea/argument which tells us what your whole paragraph is all about.
2. Evidence from outside sources which offer the argument(s) put forward when you look at the sentence that is topic.
3. Some personal input from the author analysing the points put forward into the topic sentence while the outside sources.

A conclusion:
Summarises the points that are main gives a remedy to your question.